Monday, July 10, 2006

Listening, Caring, Empowering – A Flexible, Inclusive Alternative to Traditional Strategic Planning [with 3+ minutes of audio MP3 attached]

Traditional strategic planning that produces 4-inch thick 'dust sucker' plan books covering the next five years doesn't fit the conditions facing most colleges and universities these days. President David Eisler's approach is more flexible, more inclusive, and takes advantage of changing communications options. [THIS POSTING IS ACCOMPANIED BY AN MP3 AUDIO FILE OF THE LAST 3 MINUTES - THE CLOSING SUMMARY OF THIS INTERVIEW. FOR THE FULL 55 MINUTE MP3 AUDIO RECORDING OF THIS INTERVIEW OF EISLER - CONDUCTED BY STEVEN W. GILBERT, PRESIDENT, OF THE TLT GROUP - SEE NEXT POST BELOW IN TLT-SWG.]

Eisler, President since July, 2003 of Ferris State University, spent 80+ hours last academic year meeting face-to-face with groups of faculty, staff and students. These meetings are the heart of an organic planning process that he began when he arrived at Ferris State. This ongoing program invites everyone to help articulate and sharpen a vision for the university. Eisler models the importance of listening – listening to everyone, caring about everyone – and responding to the feedback he so actively, frequently solicits. [Ferris State, located in Big Rapids, Michigan, has 10,000 undergrads and 1000 grad students. See http://www.ferris.edu/president/homepage.htm ]

In another stage of this flexible planning process, Eisler creates one-year task forces – with both volunteer and assigned members – to address key issues and make recommendations to the most senior university administrators.

President Eisler also comfortably uses email, the Web, and other technology applications to support communication and collaboration among faculty, staff, and students. These simple, practical uses of technology – including an online “electronic suggestion box”- are quite effective and do not distract from or impede the fundamental goals of the planning process.

Most recently, Eisler has begun a similar series of meetings with Ferris alumni, another group he hopes to engage even more actively in building and achieving the emerging shared vision for Ferris State University. President Eisler is committed to empowering ALL Ferris stakeholders, getting them engaged in solving problems, and building connections among them.

Listening, Caring, Empowering: Pres. David Eisler, Full Interview 7-9-2006

Listening, Caring, Empowering – A Flexible, Inclusive Alternative to Traditional Strategic Planning.
Attached MP3 is recording of full 7-9-2006 interview (just short of one hour) by Steven W. Gilbert of David Eisler, President since July, 2003 of Ferris State University, located in Big Rapids, Michigan.





For more about Eisler and Ferris State University, see http://www.ferris.edu/president/homepage.htm

Thursday, June 29, 2006

Boundaries in Academia: Personal, Professional, Political, Spiritual? [with <1 minute of audio]

What are the ideal “boundaries” that should exist between “the professional,” “the personal,” “the political,” and "the spiritual"?
How can academics best integrate [or separate] their professional, personal, political, and spiritual lives?
In particular, is it possible for faculty who teach in ANY discipline to engage with their students beyond the narrowest definition of the purpose and content of a single course? Should they? Can they avoid doing so?
Is it only those who teach in the humanities who should expect to influence students’ lives beyond the classroom?
How does the changing role of information technology make any difference?

In the attached MP3 audio clip, Paul Lacey, Emeritus of Earlham College laceypa@earlham.edu, responds briefly to the first questions.

For more info, questions for discussion, etc., from our beginning exploration of these boundaries see: http://www.tltgroup.org/ClothingTheEmperor/PersonalProfessionalPoliticalSpiritualBoundaries.htm

The most specific question emerging from my work in this area with Whitman College is:
“Can we establish a policy that students who send email to faculty between midnight and 6AM may not expect responses during that period?”
Email can easily pierce the veil between home and office. At Whitman and other colleges/universities where there is a longstanding commitment to encouraging frequent and significant communication between students and faculty, this can be a very mixed blessing.

From Earlham College Website <http://www.earlham.edu/graduateprograms/content/mat/>: "It is worth acknowledging, in all humility, that, though there are many great, beautiful, noble callings for human beings — ministry, healing, protecting the powerless through the law, making art, music and literature, the most wonderful things that human beings are privileged to do — none of them is more valuable to the human race, to the future of the planet, or to our own souls, than the work of teaching."— Dr. Paul Lacey, Professor Emeritus of English, Earlham College

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Shared Governance - Making Respectful Trade-offs [with 3.3 minutes of audio]

"Overload, Shared Governance & Productive Assessment
- New Paradoxes (and Paradigms?)"
Do you see a shift away from older patterns of shared governance when lines could be drawn more clearly and easily between different parts of an educational institution? … What if anything could be done to help faculty and others to be involved more comfortably and constructively in these trade-off kinds of decisions?

Here are excerpts from “Clothing the Emperor” series online interview of Richard A. Detweiler (Rick), President, Great Lakes Colleges Association, December 7, 2005, by Steven W. Gilbert, President, The TLT Group. In the attached MP3 file, you will here the complete versions of Gilbert’s final question about the changing patterns of shared governance and Detweiler’s insightful, helpful answer.

EXCERPT FROM GILBERT’S FINAL INTERVIEW QUESTION AND COMMENTS FOR DETWEILER 12/7/2005:
Do you see a shift away from older patterns of shared governance when lines could be drawn more clearly and easily between different parts of an educational institution? When making trade-offs across those lines was usually unnecessary? What if anything could be done to help faculty and others to be involved more comfortably and constructively in these trade-off kinds of decisions?

Additional comments from Gilbert:I believe that significant educational decisions for colleges and universities now often require new kinds of trade-offs, and that makes old patterns of shared governance much harder to sustain. Within any college or university the professional success of people from different academic departments and offices has depended on their mastery of very different kinds of reasoning, proof, and argument. It can be hard for people who are so committed to different ways of thinking to reach reasonable conclusions together. The training that most faculty members have for their professional roles has not prepared them well for making decisions that require weighing the needs and goals of other groups. Your career has taken you through many roles (faculty member, administrator, president, board member…), so your insights on this topic would be especially valuable.

Other Related Resources
Full Interview Archive [Open in Internet Explorer Only]
Related TLT Group Resources
Online Institute Home Page
Faculty/Professional Development
Dangerous Discussions
Clothing the Emperor

Monday, June 26, 2006

"26 Days!" [1.5 Mins. Audio - Cajun Academic Humor]

Another Boudreaux story "26 Days!" is now available

For more Boudreaux stories – Cajun Academic Humor - go to:
http://www.tltgroup.org/listserv/tlt-swg.html
I hope you enjoy them!

Steve Gilbert
NOTE: David E. Boudreaux, native and resident of Thibodaux, La., is Vice President for Institutional Advancement at Nicholls State University. We appreciate the warmth, good nature, and underlying care for humanity that often emerges from his unique "Cajun Academic Humor." Boudreaux's stories have provided welcome breaks in our ever-busier, ever more fragmented lives, and helped us regain a broader, healthier perspective.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

What if students learn better in a course they don't like?

What if the following are BOTH true for a particular course at the same time?
A. Some kind of learning outcomes assessment conducted on all students who just completed the course clearly demonstrates superior student learning when compared with similar assessments of similar courses.
AND
B. Some kind of student ratings collected for the same course clearly demonstrate that the students are more dissatisfied with this course than with similar courses.

Or vice versa.

For an annotated, linked table of contents to an ongoing discussion of this topic – which emerged from The TLT Group’s most recent online workshop about Student Course Evaluations/Ratings/Assessments, see:
http://www.tltgroup.org/studentcourseeval/BusTestvOtherTest.htm
Which offers links to the blog where you can read others’ thoughtful, edited responses and add your own comments, etc..

Monday, June 19, 2006

Use Blogs, Wikis, etc. for Teaching/Learning? Pro/Con

How would you convince a colleague that it is/isn't worthwhile to learn to use blogs (etc.) for teaching/learning? Provide at least one argument likely to convince a faculty colleague to try to do so. Provide at least one argument likely to convince a faculty colleague NOT to try to do so. [If you prefer, provide the arguments for an "academic administrator" or "student" or "instructional designer" instead of a faculty member.]

For more "Dangerous Discussions" issues related to educational uses of blogs, wikis, podcasts, etc., see:
http://www.tltgroup.org/ProFacDev/DangerousDiscussions/Issues/blogs.htm

This is for participants in the TLT Group's Online Institute Workshop:Blogs, Wikis, and NewsfeedsNew Web Tools for Teaching/Learning?June 6, 13, 20 at 1 pm EST

Please provide your arguments as suggested above by adding one comment to this posting. Please give your name and institution.

Friday, June 16, 2006

Student Engagement, Learning Communities at Johnson C. Smith University

Telephone interview with Phyllis Dawkins, Dir. Faculty Development, Johnson C. Smith U. about student engagement, learning communities, assessment, related practices and resources; more detail in recording attached (7.5 minutes MP3 - also avail. as TLT-SWG podcast episode).

SKELETAL TEXT SUMMARY [Questions from Steven W. Gilbert = "SWG"
Responses from Phyllis Dawkins = "PWD"]

SWG: What is JCSU doing to develop Student Engagement?
PWD: Trying to find activities that promote social and academic engagement. Using active and collaborative learning; problem-based learning, assignment-based useful activities that result in "artifacts" for ePortfolios.


SWG: How do you know these activities are working?
PWD: In Learning Community program, collaborative/cooperative learning, including service learning and co-curricular activities, have made a difference in terms of student learning and persistence (more high grades, fewer failing grades, fewer on academic probation, fewer judiciary incidents, less negative behavior) .

SWG: What are "Learning Communities" at JCSU?
PWD: Freshman learning communities (cohorts); all 400+ freshmen in learning communities cohorts of 20-30 for 15+ hours per week; each cohort works on a block/theme.

SWG: What about SACS (re)accreditation coming up?
PWD: Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) focuses on Student Engagement and the role of technology.

SWG: What do you recommend most for getting started in this direction?
PWD: Learning Communities National Resource Center [at Washington Center, Evergreen College]
http://www.evergreen.edu/washcenter/project.asp?pid=73

Phyllis Worthy Dawkins
Director of Faculty Development
Dean of the College of Professional Studies
Johnson C. Smith University

NOTE: "Dr. Phyllis Worthy Dawkins (Johnson C. Smith University '75), dean of the College of Professional Studies, was named the 2006 recipient of the top award given to an individual who upholds the high professional standards of Dr. Edwin Bancroft HeE. B.son. The E.B. Henderson Award from the Ad Hoc Ethnic Minorities Council of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance (AAHPERD) was presented to Dawkins in Salt Lake City, Utah in April. While at the AAHPERD conference, she also delivered a presentation on “Using Active Learning Strategies in the Classroom to Promote Learning."

Monday, June 12, 2006

Boudreaux - Paris Story [Cajun Academic Humor]

My favorite Boudreaux story - the classic - "Boudreaux Goes to Paris"; attached (1.5 minute MP3 - also avail. from TLT-SWG podcast).

Moral of the Story: Choose A or B

A. You can't always rely on technology...

B. If the learner doesn't understand the purpose of instructional technology being used, everyone's time can be wasted.

Hope you enjoy it!
Steve Gilbert
PS: For more Boudreaux stories, go to:
http://www.tltgroup.org/listserv/tlt-swg.html



NOTE: David E. Boudreaux, native and resident of Thibodaux, La., is Vice President for Institutional Advancement at Nicholls State University. We appreciate the warmth, good nature, and underlying care for humanity that often emerges from his unique "Cajun Academic Humor." Boudreaux's stories have provided welcome breaks in our ever-busier, ever more fragmented lives, and helped us regain a broader, healthier perspective.

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Pls add Useful Resource(s) for Participants in Blogs etc. Workshop

This is for participants in the TLT Group's Online Institute Workshop:
Blogs, Wikis, and Newsfeeds
New Web Tools for Teaching/Learning?
June 6, 13, 20 at 1 pm EST

Please add a comment to this posting in which you identify yourself, and provide info about one or two resources likely to be useful to participants in this workshop.
Minimum: One sentence description and one URL.
For example:
Steven Bell has prepared a nice intro - mostly text and screen shots - to using RSS feeds and news aggregators. His first section provides a valuable, clear intro to using Bloglines (a Web-based free news aggregator ): http://staff.philau.edu/bells/rss.htm

Friday, June 09, 2006

Sex, drugs, etc. vs. iPods, Facebook, blogs?

For years I was confident that sex, drugs, rock and roll, and athletics would always account for more discretionary time among traditional-aged undergraduates than any activities involving computers and telecommunications. Maybe I was wrong. See below for excerpts from “iPods knock over beer mugs” which imply that we should find ways of using new portable devices and online services to improve teaching and learning.

I’ve also been hearing lately about many respected faculty members and other academic leaders who completely reject blogging, wikis, FaceBook - the new Web-based social networking and collaborative work tools - as utterly lacking intellectual content or educational potential. An unnecessary conflict is growing as more students bring portable devices with Web-browsing capabilities and many other functions into the classroom (and everywhere else they go). Since no one can prevent learners from using these new devices and online services, it might be better to invent more ways to use them within courses – even if not in classrooms.


iPods knock over beer mugs” By Mike Snider, USA TODAY, in print p. 9D, 6/8/2006;

[Online Updated 6/7/2006 11:20 PM ET]



Excerpts from article responding to Student Monitor's proprietary “Lifestyle & Media Study”:

[NOTE: Student Monitor is a research firm that does proprietary college student market research.

See: http://studentmonitor.ecnext.com/]

“Among the findings:

•iPods were the No. 1 "in" thing on campuses; 73% of students mentioned it….

•Drinking beer tied with the college networking site Facebook.com (71%).

[NOTE THAT FaceBook WAS NOT EVEN LISTED AS AN OPTION IN THE 2005 SURVEY!]

•Nos. 4 to 10 were drinking other alcohol (67%), text messaging (66%), downloading music (66%), going to clubs (65%), instant messaging (63%), working out (62%) and coffee (60%).”

For full text of Snider’s article, see:

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2006-06-07-ipod-tops-beer_x.htm

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Online Workshop Participants - Pls Describe Your First Blog

This is for participants in the TLT Group's Online Institute Workshop:
Blogs, Wikis, and Newsfeeds
New Web Tools for Teaching/Learning?
June 6, 13, 20 at 1 pm EST
http://www.tltgroup.org/blogworkshop/OLIworkshop6-2006.htm
Please add a comment to this posting in which you identify yourself, describe your first blog (purpose, name, anything you want to say about how easy/difficult it was to create, suggestions for others...., URL if you wish colleagues to visit your blog).

Thursday, May 25, 2006

Dangerous Discussions - Visualizing Cultures - MIT Website

A recent [April-June, 2006] controversy at MIT is relevant to our exploration of "Dangerous Discussions." The conflict about MIT's "Visualizing Cultures" Website demonstrates some confusing and painful unintended consequences of even well-intentioned and sophisticated uses of new media (the Web, visuals). This scholarly project explores the development of Japan’s relationship to Western powers and China since the mid-nineteenth century, and raises questions about the cultures of war, imperialism, and nationalism.

Here are some excerpts and links about the "Visualizing Cultures" controversy.

Main source: http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2006/visualizing-cultures.html

Statement from MIT Chancellor Phillip L. Clay April 27, 2006:

Visualizing Cultures is an interdisciplinary research project, history course and educational outreach program that uses historical images and texts of different cultures in order to learn from them. We deeply regret that a section of this web site has caused distress and pain to members of the Chinese community. Visualizing Cultures is an important and pioneering undertaking by two esteemed members of our faculty, Professor John Dower of the history faculty and Professor Shigeru Miyagawa of linguistics and of foreign languages and literatures. Professors Dower and Miyagawa have MIT's strongest support. One section of the web site -- Throwing Off Asia -- authored by Professor Dower, refers to the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895 and displays images of Japanese wood-block prints that were used as wartime propaganda. Some of these images show the atrocities of war and are examples of how societies use visual imagery as propaganda to further their political agendas. The use of these historical images is not an endorsement of the events depicted.

Many readers, however, have indicated that the purpose of the project is not sufficiently clear to counteract the negative messages within the historical images portrayed on the site. Professors Dower and Miyagawa have been meeting with members of the MIT Chinese community to discuss their concerns and have temporarily taken down the web site while these concerns are being addressed.

The response from some outside the community, on the other hand, has been inappropriate and antithetical to the mission and spirit of MIT and of any university. This is not only unfair to our colleagues, but contrary to the very essence of the university as a place for the free exploration of ideas and the embrace of intellectual and cultural diversity. In the spirit of collaboration, MIT encourages an open and constructive dialogue. We need to preserve the ability to confront the difficult parts of human history if we are to learn from them.

Phillip L. Clay Chancellor

Excerpts from statement by MIT faculty May 23, 2006:
"...Because it brings advanced technology together with humanistic research, it is a jewel of the MIT curriculum, and the Open Course Ware project makes it available to the entire world. ... The challenge to this project threatens the core values of MIT’s educational and research mission. ... We also express our strong sympathy to Professors Dower and Miyagawa for the ordeal they have suffered, and reaffirm our commitment to MIT’s basic values of academic freedom and scholarly integrity. " -

Statement from Professors Dower and Miyagawa April 27, 2006:
"We wish to express our deep regret over the emotional distress caused by some of the imagery and are genuinely sorry that the web site has caused pain within the Chinese community. This was completely contrary to our intention.

"Our purpose is to look at history in the broadest possible manner and to try to learn from this. One section of the project displays images of Japanese wood-block prints that were used as propaganda during the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895 and are examples of how societies use visual imagery to further their political agendas. These historical images do not reflect our beliefs. To the contrary, our intent was to illuminate aspects of the human experience -- including imperialism, racism, violence and war -- that we must confront squarely if we are to create a better world. These complex issues are addressed in the long text that accompanies the images. We must learn from history if we are to have a better future.

"Many people who have seen the web site, however, have indicated that the purpose of the project is not sufficiently clear to counteract the negative messages contained in the historical images portrayed on the site. Acknowledging this, we have been meeting with members of the Chinese community and others here at MIT to discuss how we might present these materials in a way that more effectively fosters understanding across cultures. In the meantime, we have temporarily taken down this web site while these community concerns are being addressed.

"We wish to make clear that this is a scholarly research project, and there is no art exhibition associated with it. We are grateful to those members of the MIT Chinese community who have met with us to address this issue and help heal our community.

"In these discussions, we have been guided by the central values of the university: the free exploration of ideas and the embrace of intellectual and cultural diversity. We are committed to those ideals."

John W. Dower Professor of History
Shigeru Miyagawa Professor of Linguistics and of Foreign Languages and Literatures

Statement from President Susan Hockfield May 4, 2006:

"The Visualizing Cultures web site will be relaunched within the next few days. This project -- the work of two outstanding members of our faculty -- is in the finest traditions of MIT: deep and rigorous scholarship, pioneering and innovative pedagogy and a commitment to serve society.

"Drawing on these traditions, the project illuminates complex historical and cultural issues. The web site will include all the original materials as well as added context and navigational aids that have been developed in response to thoughtful comments by members of our community. Unfortunately, among the comments received over the past week from all over the world were some that were abusive or threatening to the authors; some called for the web site to be suppressed and/or for the Institute to take action against Professors Dower and Miyagawa.

"We affirm in the strongest way possible our support for the work of these professors, and for the principles of academic freedom. While some of the text and images on the web site are painful to see, the attacks on our colleagues and their work are antithetical to all that we stand for as a university dedicated to open inquiry and the free exchange of ideas. As scholars and educators, we have an obligation to explore complex and controversial ideas, and to do so in a manner that respects those with whom we may disagree.

"As Visualizing Cultures is relaunched, we hope people will read the text, view the images and consider the important questions the authors raise. They welcome, and we all benefit from, thoughtful discourse and the learning that results from serious intellectual engagement with these matters.":
Susan Hockfield President, MIT

Statement by MIT faculty May 23, 2006:
"As faculty members of MIT, we endorse in the strongest terms the scholarly value of the Visualizing Cultures project directed by Professors John Dower and Shigeru Miyagawa.

"This prize-winning web site was created by two of the world’s leading scholars. By going to visualizingcultures.mit.edu, readers of this letter can see for themselves how, by bringing together textual explanation with thousands of images, the web site explores in detail the development of Japan’s relationship to Western powers and China since the mid-nineteenth century. It also evokes broader questions about the cultures of war, imperialism, and nationalism.

"Many of the subjects it analyzes are painful to recall, but since the authors are professional scholars of the highest caliber, the site in its entirety enlightens everyone who examines it carefully about the deepest questions of social and historical change. Because it brings advanced technology together with humanistic research, it is a jewel of the MIT curriculum, and the Open Course Ware project makes it available to the entire world.

"A small group of individuals took one image on this site out of context and broadcast it across the Internet. By doing so, they fomented an email campaign directed against MIT’s educational mission that quickly exploded out of control into a global incident. The site was temporarily shut down in response to these attacks.

"Some critics claim that the site endorses Japanese racism and militarism and therefore urge that it be permanently shut down or substantively revised. In fact, the site describes and strongly condemns the racist propaganda that supported Japanese militarism. The challenge to this project threatens the core values of MIT’s educational and research mission. We commend the eloquent statement from President Susan Hockfield in support of the project.

"We call on all interested parties to join with us to ensure that the Visualizing Cultures web site will remain in its entirety and be protected against any future attacks. We also express our strong sympathy to Professors Dower and Miyagawa for the ordeal they have suffered, and reaffirm our commitment to MIT’s basic values of academic freedom and scholarly integrity."

URL: http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2006/visualizing-cultures.html

Wednesday, May 24, 2006

Very Simple 12 Minute Intro to Feeds & Podcasts

Here's a very simple explanation of RSS feeds, blogs, podcasts, etc. - in about 12 minutes as Steve Gilbert answers a few good questions from Rebecca Kurtz of the TLT Group during a phone conversation in mid-June, 2006.
For more info, resources on these topics, also, see:

http://www.tltgroup.org/blogs.htm
and
http://www.tltgroup.org/blogworkshop/feeds.htm

Sunday, May 21, 2006

Shared Governance - Making Respectful Trade-offs - Steve Gilbert's QUESTION

EXCERPT: Do you see a shift away from older patterns of shared governance when lines could be drawn more clearly and easily between different parts of an educational institution? When making trade-offs across those lines was usually unnecessary? What if anything could be done to help faculty and others to be involved more comfortably and constructively in these trade-off kinds of decisions?

Audio attached to this blog posting is full recording of Gilbert's final question from:
"Overload, Shared Governance & Productive Assessment New Paradoxes (and Paradigms?) "
Interview of Richard A. Detweiler (Rick), President, Great Lakes Colleges Association, December 7, 2005, by Steven W. Gilbert, President, The TLT Group

FOR DETWEILER'S ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION, SEE NEXT BLOG POSTING BELOW [chronologically previous]

Audio attachment to this blog posting is a recording of Gilbert's full final question, including background observations:
I believe that significant educational decisions for colleges and universities now often require new kinds of trade-offs, and that makes old patterns of shared governance much harder to sustain. Within any college or university the professional success of people from different academic departments and offices has depended on their mastery of very different kinds of reasoning, proof, and argument. It can be hard for people who are so committed to different ways of thinking to reach reasonable conclusions together.

The training that most faculty members have for their professional roles has not prepared them well for making decisions that require weighing the needs and goals of other groups.

Your career has taken you through many roles (faculty member, administrator, president, board member…), so your insights on this topic would be especially valuable. - Steve Gilbert

Other Related Resources
Full Interview Archive [Open in Internet Explorer Only]
Other TLT Group Archives
Related TLT Group Resources
Online Institute Home Page
Faculty/Professional Development
Dangerous Discussions
Clothing the Emperor

Shared Governance - Making Respectful Trade-offs - Rick Detweiler - ANSWER

Audio attached to this blog posting is an excerpt from
"Overload, Shared Governance & Productive Assessment New Paradoxes (and Paradigms?) "
Interview of Richard A. Detweiler (Rick), President, Great Lakes Colleges Association, December 7, 2005, by Steven W. Gilbert, President, The TLT Group

Audio attachment to this blog posting is a recording of Detweiler's response to the Gilbert's final question [condensed]:
Do you see a shift away from older patterns of shared governance when lines could be drawn more clearly and easily between different parts of an educational institution? When making trade-offs across those lines was usually unnecessary? What if anything could be done to help faculty and others to be involved more comfortably and constructively in these trade-off kinds of decisions?

Saturday, May 20, 2006

SteveG's First PodCast 5-20-2006 5:44pm EDT

I hope you enjoy this first test podcast prepared by Steve Gilbert on Saturday 5/20/2006 . Just some random comments and some excerpts from Vivaldi's music!
And here's photo of my family (wife, 2 sons, daughter, daughter-in-law, self)fooling around in June, 2005.


Friday, May 19, 2006

Peer Review of Teaching - Lynda Harding - 2/2006 Clothing the Emperor



Peer Review of Teaching for Online, Hybrid/Blended, and Even Traditional Courses! -- with Lynda Harding, California State University-Fresno

Archive of Clothing the Emperor Webcast: http://www.tltgroup.org/Archive/CtE02.02/index.htm

Related resources:
http://www.tltgroup.org/clothingtheemperor/course-peer-review.htm
Click here to listen to the podcast!

Thursday, May 18, 2006

Offshore Tutoring - Who loses?

Creative Disruption - Why the nation should celebrate math tutors in Cochin
Thursday, May 18, 2006; A22; Wash. Post
"...If a teenager in Potomac can learn geometry from a tutor in Cochin, India, there's no reason why many other U.S. service jobs can't be done from abroad.

"...trading of services over broadband is likely to disrupt the lives of more Americans than trade in manufacturing has done recently.

"...By dividing U.S. service jobs into those that can be delivered over broadband connections (tax preparation, radiology) and those that require face-to-face contact (restaurant jobs, dentistry), Mr. Blinder estimates that as many as 42 million U.S. jobs are potentially at risk. That's almost a third of all jobs in the economy. It's also three times more jobs than exist in U.S. manufacturing.

"...The availability of $20-an-hour math tutoring may help erode the advantage that rich children have in college entrance tests. Meanwhile, foreign exporters get a chance to escape poverty; the tutor in the Post story was earning twice as much as in her previous job as a high school teacher. And the idea that any of this erodes American vitality is unconvincing. To the contrary, Indian math tutors may boost U.S. high school math scores, fixing a much lamented weak spot in the nation's competitive outlook. "

© 2006 The Washington Post Company

Sunday, May 07, 2006

New [Beyond] Publishing

What’s "'"' what's really new, unprecedented: Collaborative, multi-person, self-initiated, self-controlled multi-media publishing…
NOT only receiving; NOT only single publisher, single receiver....


FOLLOWING ARE EXCERPTS FROM: Sites Let Amateurs Be Published Authors Without the Book Deal By Leslie Walker, Thursday, May 4, 2006; 10:55 AM; © 2006 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive

["Blurb", "Lulu", et al. are Web-based on-demand book publishing services.]

“’The book industry is next in line to be 'indied' after music and movies,’ declared Blurb founder Eileen Gittins, referring to material that ordinary people produce independent of large media companies. ‘In the past three years there has been a huge shift from people being downloaders and consumers, to being uploaders and producers.’”

…“Lulu is an on-demand publishing service that prints and ships each book as it is ordered, then offers online tools for authors to sell and market their books over the Web. With no upfront fees, Lulu ( http://www.lulu.com/ ) takes a commission only when each book is sold.”

…“Blurb and Lulu say they are unleashing people's pent-up desire to publish books that otherwise might have never existed, much the same way that Web logs triggered a new wave of self-expression.”

“More than 91,000 professionally bound books were published through Lulu in January alone, nearly three times the 35,500 paper tomes the site produced last August. Sales are running at about $1 million a month but growing at an extraordinary clip of 10 percent monthly, said founder Bob Young.

“Both Lulu and Blurb take advantage of the economics of modern digital printers, which mimic copiers and laser printers rather than the costlier offset printing presses that require minimum print runs of thousands of copies. While today's book publishing industry is set up mostly to print books in volume, Lulu and Blurb are all about publishing one at a time.
“Each transmits the author's final manuscript over the Internet to a professional printing firm, where it is printed, bound and shipped directly to the purchaser or author. No humans massage manuscripts en route. Nor are warehouses and bookstores involved, as in traditional publishing.

“Pricing and mechanics differ at Lulu and Blurb, though the basic process is similar. At Lulu, authors upload their material as preformatted, printer-ready files and then tweak them online. Blurb offers offline formatting by providing special software that authors download and use to lay out text and images.