Tuesday, July 12, 2011

“people with disabilities have only half the rate of Internet access of people without a disability”


"Surveys consistently report that people with disabilities have only half the rate of Internet access of people without a disability. Despite regular increases over time, people with disabilities have not caught up, and still face a significant digital divide.
"Despite the regular increases, both metro and non-metro people with disabilities have lower rates of Internet use than their geographic counterparts with no disability. However, non-metro people with disabilities have the lowest rate (26.7%)."
- from "Disability and the Digital Divide: Comparing Surveys with Disability Data" Center for Excellence in Disability Education, Research, And Service; Rural Institute, University of Montana , part of University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities (UCEDDs)



"People living with disability are less likely than other adults to use the internet.

Monday, July 11, 2011

Adjuncts Become More Important [At least more widely used; but "get no respect"?]

"I get no respect"
#vwwt2000 PREDICTION #18 OF 20 from year 2000 
Adjuncts Become More Important
Adjunct faculty members, especially retirees from first careers, will continue to become a growing part of the teaching faculty at most colleges – both in classrooms and online. Support services for adjuncts will become more common and necessary. Part-time teaching may prove among the most attractive and self-respect-enhancing new retirement options.


See: Adjunct Faculty:  Conflicting Trends? More Part-Time Teachers vs. Delayed Retirements 1995-20??  

[UPDATE 2011:  STILL WAITING! 

I'm still waiting for the increases in support services for adjuncts commensurate with their numbers and the extent to which undergraduate programs rely on them.  I'm also still waiting for the "self-respect-enhancing new retirement options"! 
In year 2000, along with many others, I noticed the increasing role of part-time faculty in higher education instruction.  However, I did NOT anticipate the current economic recession and how it would press so many "senior" faculty members to delay their retirement and how that might change the balance of part-time and full-time teachers encountered by most undergraduate students.]

- 18th of 20 predictions from "A New Vision Worth Working Toward: Connected Education and Collaborative Change," Steven W. Gilbert, 2000-2006, First version published via AAHESGIT listserv January, 2000; PDF of full article

Adjunct Faculty: Conflicting Trends? More Part-Time Teachers vs. Delayed Retirements 1995-20??

Adjunct Faculty - Roles, Support
"...we see clearly the greatest decline in the full-time tenure-track faculty and the most significant growth in the part-time faculty." [1995-2007] -  "One Faculty Serving All Students;  An Issue Brief," by the Coalition on the Academic Workforce, February, 2010  


 "almost a quarter of faculty members ages 50 to 70 who were saving for retirement expected to retire later than they had planned, with an average delay of three years."  Economy Slows Colleges' Ability to Hire and (Maybe) Retirements, Too By Kathryn Masterson July 25, 2010 - The Chronicle of Higher Education:


"Less Than 1/3 Higher Ed Teachers Full-Time Tenure-Track in 2007...
almost three-fifths of the teaching corps in higher education taught part-time in 2007—58.5% in all institutions (55.9% in four-year institutions)... full-time tenured and tenure-track faculty members made up only 25.1% (27.5% in four-year institutions). 
Thus close to 75% of the instructional workforce was made up of non-tenure-track faculty members and graduate employees in 2007...
Furthermore, looking at the changes in these categories since 1995, we see clearly the greatest decline in the full-time tenure-track faculty and the most significant growth in the part-time faculty. 
Excluding graduate student TAs, in 2007 less than one-third of all faculty members—31.1%—were professors in full-time tenured or tenure-track positions, compared with 42.3% in 1995 ... In four-year institutions the figure is 36.7%, compared with 51.3% in 1995"
- Excerpts from "One Faculty Serving All Students;  An Issue Brief," by the Coalition on the Academic Workforce, February, 2010  

Friday, July 08, 2011

Academic Freedom Redefined? Who "owns the means of production" in education?

#vwwt2000 PREDICTION #17 OF 20 from year 2000
"Kali, Avatar of the eBook"
Who decides what is taught?  How and when?


PREDICTION 17:  Academic Freedom Redefined
As faculty and student roles shift and new educational resources are integrated, academic freedom and faculty leadership will remain highly valued; but they may be redefined. Many faculty members will embrace greater responsibility for identifying, selecting, and implementing pedagogical options – and supportive applications of technology.

Still likely?
In year 2000 I didn't anticipate the VARIETY and AVAILABILITY of information resources, information tools, and portable/mobile digital devices that would become irresistible to most students and many teachers by 2011.   Nor did I anticipate how such resources, tools, and devices could not be owned or controlled by any college or university.  Nor the continuing fluidity of "textbooks":  Who controls them?  How are they "published"? How are they used by students?

See Parody Alternatives to Traditional Textbooks, Courses, Degrees from Mental_Floss


- 17th of 20 predictions from "A New Vision Worth Working Toward: Connected Education and Collaborative Change," Steven W. Gilbert, 2000-2006, First version published via AAHESGIT listserv January, 2000; PDF of full article

Thursday, July 07, 2011

Facebook/Skype Accelerate Moore's Law? Doubling "content" yearly!

Moore's Law
"An average 4bn [4,000,000,000] items, from videos to news stories and recommendations, are shared on Facebook every day. The amount of content being shared has doubled since this time last year and, predicted Zuckerberg, will, double again by this time next year."  

VALUE RISING: Purposeful Combinations of Tech/Pedagogy/Content & HUMAN MOMENTS

Hands Touching; Technology for Sharing
 #vwwt2000 PREDICTION #16 OF 20 from year 2000
Better Understanding of Face-to-Face Communication and Other Teaching/Learning Options


NOTE:  Now, in 2011, I believe the last 4 of these 20 predictions - beginning with this one - have become even more important.  But they face tougher challenges today than I anticipated in 2000.  I am still hopeful.


Educators, corporate leaders, and many others (religious leaders? entertainers?) will learn to take greater advantage of the unique possibilities of face-to-face communications. They will do so in conjunction with the invention of new ways of combining applications of technology, pedagogical options, content, and purposes. They will discover the new power of matching all of these with the different capabilities and styles of individual learners, individual teachers, and groups of both. Hallowell's "human moments" [see Connect by Edward Hallowell] in which two human beings talk AND LISTEN to each other in the same place at the same time will be more highly valued and sought more intentionally and frequently.

- 16th of 20 predictions from "A New Vision Worth Working Toward: Connected Education and Collaborative Change," Steven W. Gilbert, 2000-2006, First version published via AAHESGIT listserv January, 2000; PDF of full article

Wednesday, July 06, 2011

More Speech, Recordings on the Web - Helpful, Hateful, Educational?

Spy Gear: CURRENT, PUBLIC, COMMERCIAL!
#vwwt2000 PREDICTION #15 OF 20 from year 2000

Human speech on the Web – recorded or delivered live -- will take a central role in many kinds of education. It will become easy for faculty members and students to add recordings of their own speech to text and other information media. Voice recognition software may dramatically alter human-computer interaction and all related communications/education activities; probably NOT by eliminating keyboards, but by adding another attractive mode for controlling technology and entering and editing text.

Still likely?


UPDATE
In year 2000 I didn't anticipate the VARIETY, AVAILABILITY, and CAPABILITIES of portable/mobile digital devices in 2011. Moore's Law in action!  
THE GOOD NEWS:  Unassisted non-techies can almost produce and publish their own audio and video recordings.  They can also ALMOST manage many devices and produce text using only their own voices.  And the continuing accuracy of Moore's Law promises easier, cheaper, faster, more accurate versions of these tools, with smart phones and iPads leading the way.
THE BAD NEWS:  No matter where you are, no matter what you're doing, someone might record and publish!  See "Sousveillance" "Brin’s corollary to Moore’s Law” Cameras vs. Authority/Privacy?

- 15th of 20 predictions from "A New Vision Worth Working Toward: Connected Education and Collaborative Change," Steven W. Gilbert, 2000-2006, First version published via AAHESGIT listserv January, 2000; PDF of full article

Tuesday, July 05, 2011

Student Technology Assistant Programs - FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions about Student Technology Assistant Programs


How do STAs save money?
STAs are trained to do many of the same functions that are done by full time technical staff. Because STAs receive a small percentage of the salary/benefits of full time permanent staff, the institution can expand services to meet IT support service demands.



How will STAs be managed?
The STA program is designed around the concept of self management. A professional staff person will use a multi-level student management model to create an integrated management process that gives students management experience and increases the availability of full time IT staff to do the more demanding assignments.



In what areas can STAs work?
In the model institutions, the STAs work in the following areas: Technical support for faculty, Campus Computer Labs, Classroom Support, Desktop Support, Help Desk, Network Services, Peer Training, Photo Services, Printing Services, Shortcourses, Technical Resources, Television Services, Visual Design Services, and Web Maintenance Services.



What kind of training do STAs receive?
An important aspect of the program is an ongoing mentoring model that enables students to work closely and learn from seasoned staff. In addition, ongoing formal training takes place throughout the year, and an intensive hands-on training program is held each summer that STAs are required to attend.



Does this mean that an institution can eliminate IT staff positions?
Eliminating full time staffing is not usual for organizations that have implemented STA Programs. While some have used funds from vacant positions to initially fund the program, the emphasis has been on using money more effectively to develop better IT support across the institution.


What advantages are there to the students?
The student advantages are plentiful: career preparation through real work experience, management experience, and enhanced information literacy (especially for the non IT majors); learning and growth as a result of their working with faculty and staff as IT peers; building of interpersonal skills; and being part of an active Learning Community.


Can students really step up to this level of self-management and service?
Interestingly this concern is one of the largest obstacles for this program to overcome. Since student turnover is constant and the level of responsibility high, this is an often asked question. The best answer is that all of the model STA institutions have succeeded beyond their expectations.

Student Technology Assistants - STA+ (Large) Programs

Student Technology Assistants [& Other Roles for Students]

#vwwt2000 Predctn14PREDICTION #14 OF 20 from year 2000  
Student Technology Assistants

To meet the growing need for academic support services, more colleges and universities will take advantage of one of their unique resources – the students. They will move beyond current programs of using students for clerical help in the library and as room monitors in computer labs. They will provide more training for these student assistants, give them opportunities for more technologically and consultatively challenging work, and promote some to positions of responsibility for supervising and training their peers. Many students, especially those who are not pursuing technology-focused careers, will find the training and experience of these roles a major asset in preparing for most jobs or further study as the value of technology skills continues to increase in most fields.
Still likely? 

[The use of Student Technology Assistants has been growing, but much more slowly and involving many fewer students than I expected and hoped in year 2000.  The TLT Group has encouraged, enabled, and collaborated with leaders in this "movement" since 1997.]

More resources about STA programs - recently active programs, etc.  

- 14th of 20 predictions from "A New Vision Worth Working Toward: Connected Education and Collaborative Change," Steven W. Gilbert, 2000-2006, First version published via AAHESGIT listserv January, 2000; PDF of full article

"Holy ****, you're actually listening to me" Student-faculty collab to improve courses:

http://tlt.gs/FRLVFSC = Refs & Recording [Also see TLT Group's resources on Student Technology Assistants.]

Presentation/Discussion Recorded in TLT Group's FridayLive! May 20, 2011 - Homebase Webpage has links to refs, text chat transcript, audio/video recording, etc. 
Engaging Student Voices in the Study of Teaching and Learning
TLT Group's FridayLive! Presentation/Discussion series every Friday, 2pm Eastern USA Time Sept thru May;  
Free, online, interactive, moderated, live, voice/text/images/links
Description
Some institutions are attempting to increase student engagement through faculty and students designing classes together. Surprising results have been discovered:  e.g., students want demanding assignments, teaching was harder than students thought.  We'll discuss what works/doesn't work? What are the greatest obstacles? What set of conditions are necessary for collaboration?
At Elon University, collaboration is initiated by experienced faculty who believe students who recently took a course were not learning something important - not learning it easily or well enough. 1 faculty + a few students per course, all volunteers, meet 6-8 times before course begins again.  Students encouraged to share expertise on student experience, attitudes.  Faculty encouraged to share expertise in subject, course, teaching.  

Students read work of previous students, observe current class, provide peer view of student learning;  privacy, confidentiality honored.
Students like being listened to by faculty:  "Holy ****, you're actually listening to me" 

Most faculty participating are recognized as teaching "good" courses, not "broken" courses.
Collaborations organized and facilitated by Director of Center for Advancement of Teaching and Learning. 

But not all are convinced that course design collaboration is wise. In this session, Peter Felten will join Steve Gilbert to share how his team at Elon University undertook student-faculty collaboration almost five years ago. Peter's team has written and spoken widely on the topic and we welcome their insight into some key questions about collaboration: What works/doesn't work? What are the greatest obstacles? What set of conditions are necessary for collaboration? 

For an example of a certain kind of intensive student-fac collaboration in SHAPING  a course, see http://www.tltgroup.org/icampus/eecscadres.htm

Also see Faculty-Student Teams Design Courses - Antidote for "Academically Adrift"?   <http://tlt-swg.blogspot.com/2011/04/faculty-student-teams-design-courses.html> 

Read more about McDaniel's and Elon's efforts to improve student engagement!

Monday, July 04, 2011

Student Technology Assistants - STA+ (Large) Programs from TLT Group

Some institutions have STA programs far beyond most others.   
STA Wildlife video project - URI

Many institutions use student assistants to assist in their computing labs and provide other technology services at a modest level:
  • Raising the quality and level of technical service within the institution and 
  • Providing exceptional educational opportunities to the participating students.
These outstanding STA+ programs differ in many ways, but share most of these characteristics:
  • Demonstrably improve the level and quality of information technology support services at dramatically lower cost than any other option; 
  • Train many students in technical, consulting and organizational skills; 
  • Rely on (and develop) the ability of students to supervise, train, and manage other students; 
  • Include students from both technical and non-technical majors; 
  • Provide service learning options for participating students; 
  • Allow many students to experience the benefits of "learning by teaching"; and 
  • Enable many technology support professionals to spend more time providing services that make better use of their expertise. 
 The TLT Group has encouraged, enabled, and collaborated with leaders in this "movement" since 1997.  FAQs

_Engaging Student Voices_ Book about Student-Teacher Collaboration to Improve Learning, Courses, Teaching

Engaging Student Voices in the Study of Teaching and Learning
More info @Amazon Link
Edited/authored by  Fac/Stud teams.

"...faculty-student team co-edited this book, and faculty-student (or former student) teams co-authored eight of its eleven chapters."

"This book addresses... 'Should teachers engage students directly in discussions and inquiry about learning? To what extent? What is gained by the collaboration? Does it improve learning, and what do shared responsibilities mean for classroom dynamics, and beyond?' " 

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Higher Ed Ready for Compassionate Pioneers? Sharing Instructional Resources?

Donated Corneal Transplant - 2 Stitches Showing








A "compassionate pioneer" is someone who has demonstrated commitments to BOTH exploring new educational and technological options AND helping colleagues - at least some of the time. 


Can the culture of colleges, universities, and academic disciplines support the development and use of shared instructional resources? - This still imiportant question taken from Observations Section of "A New Vision Worth Working Toward: Connected Education and Collaborative Change," Steven W. Gilbert, 2000-2006, First version published via AAHESGIT listserv January, 2000; PDF of full article


See also Exemplar:  Tom Creed,  "Many Swords, Many Stones"  


More from Observations 2000 about Compassionate Pioneers

Extend, Coordinate, and/or Outsource Academic Support Services - Harder Today than Y2K!

#vwwt2000 Predctn13

PREDICTION #13 OF 20 from year 2000
Still likely?
Extend, Coordinate, and/or Outsource Academic Support Services

More colleges and universities will form local centers and/or related institutional Web-based directories, forums, and services to coordinate the work of existing academic support services, encourage the development of new combinations of those services, and make it easier for faculty and students to find and use those services. More institutions will also “outsource” some technology and other academic support services and/or develop inter-institutional collaborations for more cost-effective delivery of those services. Other new commercial services may provide “academic” support services directly to faculty members or students – with or without the involvement of the colleges or universities in which those learners and teachers do their work. This may be a new role for textbook publishers and other companies in education-related industries.

- 13th of 20 predictions from "A New Vision Worth Working Toward: Connected Education and Collaborative Change," Steven W. Gilbert, 2000-2006, First version published via AAHESGIT listserv January, 2000; PDF of full article

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

New Faculty Responsibilities, Increasing Workload for All

#vwwt2000 PREDICTION #12 OF 20 from year 2000 
Still likely?
New Faculty Responsibilities, Increasing Workload for All
See also: Overloaditorium


More faculty members will decide that their professional responsibilities include keeping current with the knowledge accumulating in their fields, pedagogical options, and supportive technology applications. The workload for faculty, academic support professionals, and academic administrators will continue to increase. 

[In year 2000 I didn't anticipate the VARIETY of portable/mobile digital devices that would be in common use by 2011.]



See also:

“I’ve got to go home; I really need to get some work done."
and see:  Overloaditorium
Our Motto: If working 24 hours a day isn't enough, you have to work nights. 
- James Moss, 1985, USNA
Our Challenge: TMI/TMO/TLT/TL$
Too Much Information / Too Many Options / Too Little Time / Too Little Money!
- Steven W. Gilbert, Founding President, TLT Group
You don't have time for this! Or anything else! ...but...:

and see:   "Overload Syndrome"

- 12th of 20 predictions from "A New Vision Worth Working Toward: Connected Education and Collaborative Change," Steven W. Gilbert, 2000-2006, First version published via AAHESGIT listserv January, 2000; PDF of full article

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

[STILL] Unrecognized Revolution in Higher Education

The unrecognized revolution in higher education is the growing use of word-processing, presentation graphics (PowerPoint), electronic mail, and the World Wide Web IN CONJUNCTION WITH TRADITIONALLY SCHEDULED AND STRUCTURED COURSES. [See Kenneth C. Green’s data about growth in course-related use of email and the Web in higher education in the last 5 years.]  Many of the faculty themselves and the reporters who observe them have not noticed the significance of these changes.  

An observer looking in the windows of most classrooms at most colleges and universities doesn’t see anything very different from a few decades ago.  The communication between faculty and students via Email outside of class doesn’t show.  The increasingly common practice of putting some course-related information on the Web for student access doesn’t show.  The frequent student use of the Web to reach that information or to do assigned research doesn’t show.

Something like half of all courses in colleges and universities in the United States already involve some Email communication among students and faculty.  Many faculty members report two major changes:  First, the volume of correspondence in the form of Email they exchange with colleagues and students has dramatically increased – and so has their workload.  Second, they are also receiving course-related communications from students AFTER a course has ended.  [Note:  Less data is available about the widespread but un-publicized adoption of technology applications in academic departments where those applications have become essential for doing the work of the discipline;  e.g., accounting, architecture, music, geography, health sciences.]

Many faculty members, beginning to use Email and the Web in these ways, would answer “No” if asked if they use information technology in their teaching.  They don’t initially perceive these changes as significant.  But they are.

- from Observations Section of "A New Vision Worth Working Toward: Connected Education and Collaborative Change," Steven W. Gilbert, 2000-2006, First version published via AAHESGIT listserv January, 2000; PDF of full article

“I’ve got to go home; I really need to get some work done.”

Overloaded, Overconnected, and Disconnected  #VWWT2000 
Many work harder and fall farther behind.   Also see:  New Faculty Responsibilities, Increasing Workload for All (Prediction #12 from Y2K)  tlt.gs/obsover












Information overload is dramatically increasing.  So is work overload.  Having almost constant access to new varieties of communication tools means being almost constantly accessible to a growing flood of messages and information – personal, impersonal, and semi-personal.  Many people are finding they can’t get their work done in the office.  (“I’ve got to go home;  I really need to get some work done.”)  The overload has many people both “overconnected and disconnected”.  They are recipients of more information than ever before.  They don’t know how to manage and digest it.  They don’t have much time or energy left for meaningful personal relations.  [See the “human moment” in Connect by Edward Hallowell.]


Most faculty seem to have adjusted to the acceleration in knowledge growth in their fields, and so have most of the related support professionals.  However, neither the faculty nor those who are responsible for supporting their teaching can keep up with the new acceleration in growth of instructional options.  Many feel increasingly obliged to identify and understand their pedagogical and technological options and to make thoughtful choices among them.  Many work harder and fall farther behind.  Expectations outstrip resources.  The signs of stress are abundant.

Creativity & achievement of excellence using new media for communications, educ, & the arts can‘t be accelerated or guaranteed.


The dramatic revolution in education, claimed or hoped for by many, never arrives.  But a less visible transformation is [STILL] well underway.  

Patience and Gratitude for Progress, But No “Moore’s Law for Learning"

We must be patient.  Human creativity and the achievement of excellence in the use of new media for communications, education, and the arts cannot be accelerated or guaranteed. After almost a century of movie-making, only a few new films each year offer genuinely new approaches to using that medium.  And only a few are truly satisfying for those who made them and those who view them.  We must be grateful to those who keep trying and for their occasional success.  [Also, look at the low success rate for new books, TV series, …]

OVERVIEW OF OBSERVATIONS FROM Y2K - Apply in 2011!?



Accelerating Change, Demand, Access, and Challenge  tlt.gs/accelchange



Wikineet
The demand for higher education is increasing – for more of it, and for more kinds of it.  More colleges and universities are breaking ground for new buildings than are closing.  New technology applications, that appear to have great educational potential, arrive from industry at an accelerating pace.  While distance education isn’t catching on nearly as fast, widely, or cost-effectively as the zealots claimed and the technophobes feared, the majority of faculty, students, and administrators are rapidly embracing fundamental technology tools for communication and information management.  An unprecedented foundation for educational change is being laid, but with no clear picture of the edifice that will arise from it. 

Meanwhile, the “digital divide” is widening.  Children of the poor have dramatically less access to computers and new information resources in their schools or colleges than the wealthy – just when more careers require information technology skills.  Dozens [hundreds?  thousands?] of colleges are now requiring or providing computers for all students, faculty, and staff;  and these institutions are exploring the educational potential of “ubiquitous computing.”  However, on many other college and university campuses, the information technology resources available to faculty and students vary markedly between departments or divisions (with schools of education often among those with the smallest budgets per student for these tools).  Many undergraduates who cannot afford their own computers have family and job obligations that make it inconvenient to use publicly available labs.  Even with borrowing computers from friends and getting permission to use computers in the workplace for educational purposes, students who may need it most have less frequent, less comfortable access.

The economics of higher education are shifting in unpredictable ways.  The clear old line between students’ paying tuition for courses and paying fees for course-related learning materials (books, etc.) is rapidly blurring.  More faculty members are assigning instructional materials that students can find on the Web, more students resist buying required textbooks, and more students are comfortable going to the Web instead of to the library for reserved readings.  Consequently, new financial relationships are developing among students, faculty, publishers, bookstores, libraries, and colleges.  The publishers and bookstore managers are especially eager to understand or create viable new business models.  Some of these might give a more significant role to faculty members who develop course-related “online” materials and find new ways of collecting fees from students or their colleges/universities.


Verbatim Prediction from 2000 Applies in 2011: Shifting Relations Among Courses, Textbooks, Web, Money, Libraries #vwwt2000

The economics of higher education are [STILL!] shifting in unpredictable ways.   


The clear old line between students’ paying tuition for courses and paying fees for course-related learning materials (books, etc.) is  [STILL!] rapidly blurring.  


 [STILL!] More faculty members are assigning instructional materials that students can find on the Web, more students resist buying required textbooks, and more students are comfortable going to the Web instead of to the library for reserved readings.  


Consequently, new financial relationships are  [STILL!] developing among students, faculty, publishers, bookstores, libraries, and colleges.  The publishers and bookstore managers are  [STILL!] especially eager to understand or create viable new business models.  Some of these might give a more significant role to faculty members who develop course-related “online” materials and find new ways of collecting fees from students or their colleges/universities.


- from Observations Section of "A New Vision Worth Working Toward: Connected Education and Collaborative Change," Steven W. Gilbert, 2000-2006, First version published via AAHESGIT listserv January, 2000; PDF of full article