Friday, September 16, 2011

"Planning Fallacy" Limits Efficacy "in the grip of a big, complex mess” e.g. Curriculum Revision. Need Frugal Innovation!

"When you are in the grip of a big, complex mess, you have the power to do discrete good but probably not systemic good." - From "The Planning Fallacy," by David Brooks, in print on September 16, 2011, on page A29 of the New York edition of the New York Times. More excerpts below.

"Frugal Innovation" is a constructive approach that can work under the daunting circumstances and within the limits to efficacy that Brooks' describes.

  • Frugal Innovation is guided, supported, visionary, and persistently incremental.
  • Frugal Innovation demonstrates commitment to improving teaching and learning by taking better advantage of available resources (including rapidly changing technology) without sacrificing what matters most to us all.
More Excerpts from Brooks - See esp. daunting history of curriculum revision below:

"When the Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman was a young man, he led a committee to write a new part of the curriculum for Israeli high schools. The committee worked for a year, and Kahneman asked his colleagues how long they thought the rest of the project would take. Their estimates were around two years. 
"Kahneman then asked the most experienced among them how long such work took other curriculum committees. The gentleman pointed out that roughly 40 percent of the committees never finished their work at all.
"But what about those that did finish? The gentleman reported that he had never seen a committee finish in less than seven years and never in more than 10. 
"This was bad news. They might fail to finish a task that they thought would be done in three years. At best, the project might consume eight or nine years. Yet this information didn’t affect those on the team at all. They carried on, assuming that though others might fail or dally, surely they wouldn’t.
"As it turned out, their project took eight years to finish. By the time it was done, the Ministry of Education had lost interest, and the curriculum was never used. 
"In his forthcoming book, “Thinking, Fast and Slow” (I’ll write more about it in a couple of weeks), Kahneman calls this the planning fallacy. Most people overrate their own abilities and exaggerate their capacity to shape the future. That’s fine. Optimistic people rise in this world. The problem comes when these optimists don’t look at themselves objectively from the outside.
"The planning fallacy is failing to think realistically about where you fit in the distribution of people like you. As Kahneman puts it, 'People who have information about an individual case rarely feel the need to know the statistics of the class to which the case belongs.'
..."the economy is not a patient. It is a zillion, zillion interactions. Government is not a doctor. Most of the time, it is a clashing collective enterprise that is occasionally able to produce marginal change, for good and for ill.
..."The key to wisdom in these circumstances is to make the distinction between discrete good and systemic good. When you are in the grip of a big, complex mess, you have the power to do discrete good but probably not systemic good.
..."you don’t have the power to transform the whole situation. Your discrete goods might contribute to an overall turnaround, but that turnaround will be beyond your comprehension and control."


Photo "Legoland, Günzburg. 'Loveparade'-Installation vor dem Reichstag in Berlin"
"Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by theFree Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.

  This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What do you think?